4.5 Article

CONSTRUCTION COSTS, PAYBACK TIMES, AND THE LEAF ECONOMICS OF CARNIVOROUS PLANTS

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
Volume 96, Issue 9, Pages 1612-1619

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.0900054

Keywords

carnivorous plants; construction costs; cost-benefit analysis of botanical carnivory; photosynthesis; plant economics; payback time; universal spectrum of leaf economics

Categories

Funding

  1. NSERC of Canada postdoctoral fellowship [02-35128, 04-00759, 04-52254, 05-46180]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding how different plant species and functional types invest carbon and nutrients is a major goal of plant ecologists. Two measures of such investments are construction costs (carbon needed to produce each gram of tissue) and associated payback times for photosynthesis to recover construction costs. These measurements integrate among traits used to assess leaf-trait scaling relationships. Carnivorous plants are model systems for examining mechanisms of leaf-trait coordination, but no studies have measured simultaneously construction costs of carnivorous traps and their photosynthetic rates to determine payback times of traps. We measured mass-based construction costs (CCmass) and photosynthesis (A(mass)) for traps, leaves, roots, and rhizomes of 15 carnivorous plant species grown under greenhouse conditions. There were highly significant differences among species in CCmass for each structure. Mean CCmass of carnivorous traps (1.14 +/- 0.24 g glucose/g dry mass) was significantly lower than CCmass of leaves of 267 noncarnivorous plant species (1.47 +/- 0.17), but all carnivorous plants examined had very low A(mass) and thus, long payback times (495-1551 h). Our results provide the first clear estimates of the marginal benefits of botanical carnivory and place carnivorous plants at the slow and tough end of the universal spectrum of leaf traits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available