4.5 Article

BRASSICACEAE PHYLOGENY INFERRED FROM PHYTOCHROME A AND NDHF SEQUENCE DATA: TRIBES AND TRICHOMES REVISITED

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
Volume 95, Issue 10, Pages 1307-1327

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.0800065

Keywords

approximately unbiased test; Arabidopsis; Brassica; Brassicaceae; ndhF; PHYA; phylogeny; trichomes

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-0408104]
  2. National Geographic [7405-03, 7452-03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The family Brassicaceae comprises 37 10 species in 338 genera, 25 recently delimited tribes, and three major lineages based on phylogenetic results front the chloroplast gene ndhF. To assess the credibility of the lineages and newly delimited tribes, we sequenced an approximately 1.8-kb region of the nuclear phytochrome A (PHYA) gene for taxa previously sampled (or the chloroplast gene ndhF. Using parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian methods, we reconstructed the phylogeny of the gene and used the approximately unbiased (AU) test to compare phylogenetic results from PHYA with findings from ndhF. We also combined ndhF and PHYA data and used a Bayesian mixed model approach to infer phylogeny. PHYA and combined analyses recovered the same three large lineages as those recovered in ndhF trees, increasing confidence in these lineages. The combined tree confirms the monophyly of most of the recently delimited tribes (only Alysseae, Anchonieae, and Descurainieae are not monophyletic), while 13 of the 23 sampled tribes are monophyletic in PHYA trees. In addition to phylogenctic results, we documented the trichome branching morphology of species across the phylogeny and explored the evolution of different trichome morphologies using the AU test. Our results indicate that dendritic, medifixed, and stellate trichomes likely evolved independently several times in the Brassicaceae.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available