4.5 Article

Responses of two bunchgrasses to nitrogen addition in tallgrass prairie: the role of bud bank demography

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
Volume 95, Issue 6, Pages 672-680

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.2007277

Keywords

Kansas; koeleria macrantha; Konza Prairie Long-Term Ecological Research Site; meristem; Poaceae; Sporobolus heterolepis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Growth of tallgrass prairie plants, many of which maintain substantial bud banks, can be limited by nitrogen (N), water, and/or light. We hypothesized that tallgrass prairie plants respond to increases in N through demographic effects on the bud bank. We tested the effects of a pulse of N on (1) bud bank demography, (2) plant reproductive allocation, and (3) ramet size. We parameterized matrix models, considering each genet as a population of plant parts. Nitrogen addition significantly impacted bud bank demography in two subdominant species of bunchgrass: Sporobolus heterolepis (a C-4 grass) and Koeleria inacrantha (a C-3 grass), but had no effect on the size of individual ramets. Emergence from the bud bank and ramet population growth rates (lambda) were significantly higher in S. heterolepis genets that received supplemental N. Nitrogen addition also affected the bud demography of K. macrantha, but N addition decreased rather than increased lambda. Prospective and retrospective demographic analyses indicated that bud bank dynamics were the most important demographic processes driving plant responses to nutrient availability. Thus, the variation in productivity in these tallgrass prairie species is driven principally by the demography of the bud bank rather than by the physiology and growth of aboveground tillers. Improved understanding of bud bank dynamics may lead to improved predictive models of grassland responses to environmental changes such as altered N deposition and precipitation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available