Journal
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE AND OTHER DEMENTIAS
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages 503-512Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1533317514522541
Keywords
cognitive intervention; cognitive stimulation; dementia; mild cognitive impairment (MCI)
Categories
Funding
- Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [SFRH/BD/64457/2009, SFRH/BD/65213/2009]
- FSE/POPH
- FEDER (POFC-COMPETE) [PIC/IC/83290/2007]
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PIC/IC/83290/2007, SFRH/BD/64457/2009, SFRH/BD/65213/2009] Funding Source: FCT
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Although some studies point to cognitive stimulation as a beneficial therapy for older adults with cognitive impairments, this area of research and practice is still lacking dissemination and is underrepresented in many countries. Moreover, the comparative effects of different intervention durations remain to be established and, besides cognitive effects, pragmatic parameters, such as cost-effectiveness and experiential relevance to participants, are seldom explored. In this work, we present a randomized controlled wait-list trial evaluating 2 different intervention durations (standard = 17 vs brief = 11 sessions) of a cognitive stimulation program developed for older adults with cognitive impairments with or without dementia. 20 participants were randomly assigned to the standard duration intervention program (17 sessions, 1.5 months) or to a wait-list group. At postintervention of the standard intervention group, the wait-list group crossed over to receive the brief intervention program (11 sessions, 1 month). Changes in neuropsychological, functionality, quality of life, and caregiver outcomes were evaluated. Experience during intervention and costs and feasibility were also evaluated. The current cognitive stimulation programs (ie, standard and brief) showed high values of experiential relevance for both intervention durations. High adherence, completion rates, and reasonable costs were found for both formats. Further studies are needed to definitively establish the potential efficacy, optimal duration, cost-effectiveness, and experiential relevance for participants of cognitive intervention approaches.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available