4.4 Article

Hydraulic Conductivity as Influenced by Stoniness in Degraded Drylands of Chile

Journal

SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL
Volume 73, Issue 2, Pages 471-484

Publisher

SOIL SCI SOC AMER
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2008.0066

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Flemish Government, Department of Sciences and Innovation/Foreign Policy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Infiltration measurements in and, stony soils are notoriously variable in visually homogeneous areas, and have been reported to be influenced by embedded stone fragments. This Study aimed to identify the influence of rock fragment contents, orientation, and position within a small and watershed on hydraulic conductivity in northern Chile. Two different measurement techniques were used, a single-ring infiltrometer with constant ponding head and a tension infiltrometer, which were applied at both an undisturbed field site (44 locations along three transects) and on the disturbed < 2-mm soil fraction from the same locations. Variations in saturated and unsaturated hydraulic conductivities were observed when using different calculation methods, adding to the observed variability For saturated conditions, only small differences in conductivities were observed between two calculation methods, whereas unsaturated hydraulic conductivities calculated by five different methods showed more important variations. Stone fragment content correlated significantly with both saturated and unsaturated conductivities, probably due to a positive correlation between stone content and coarse lacunar pore space. Slope orientations with higher amounts of stone fragments gave higher infiltration rates, as well as transects with steeper slopes and more, but smaller, rock fragments. When evaluating differences in infiltration rates observed along three transects in the watershed, variability could be mainly attributed to stone fragment content influences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available