4.5 Article

Antiplatelet and anticoagulation agents in acute coronary syndromes: What is the current status and what does the future hold?

Journal

AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 168, Issue 5, Pages 611-621

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.06.014

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. AstraZeneca
  2. Bayer
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim
  4. Bristol Myers Squibb
  5. Daiichi Sankyo
  6. Eli Lilly
  7. Iroko
  8. Pfizer
  9. Sanofi
  10. Medicines Company
  11. Merck
  12. Medtronic
  13. Merck Co
  14. Boehringer-Ingelheim
  15. Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer
  16. GlaxoSmithKline
  17. Abiomed
  18. Biotie
  19. Gilead Services
  20. Ikaria
  21. Ivivi
  22. Liposcience
  23. Pozen, Inc
  24. Sanofi Aventis
  25. Eli Lilly Company
  26. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
  27. Novartis
  28. Roche
  29. Sanofi-Aventis
  30. INO Therapeutics
  31. BMS
  32. Eli-Lilly
  33. GSK
  34. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  35. Servier
  36. Amarin
  37. Astellas
  38. Daiichi-Sankyo
  39. Lilly
  40. MSD
  41. Otsuka

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mortality and morbidity in acute coronary syndromes (ACSs), caused principally by plaque erosion or rupture leading to thrombus formation and myocardial ischemia, have been reduced by a combination of antithrombotic agents (antiplatelet drugs and anticoagulants) and early revascularization. Aspirin is the foundation antiplatelet agent. New P2Y(12) receptor inhibitors (prasugrel and ticagrelor) have clear benefits compared with clopidogrel for dual antiplatelet therapy, and cangrelor or vorapaxar, a thrombin receptor inhibitor, may be of value in specific settings. Anticoagulation uses 1 of 4 choices: bivalirudin, unfractionated heparin, enoxaparin, and fondaparinux. Moreover, some patients (such as those who have chronic atrial fibrillation) require triple therapy with aspirin, clopidogrel, plus an anticoagulant, frequently a vitamin K antagonist. New oral anticoagulants have been shown to be at least as effective as vitamin K antagonists in atrial fibrillation and led to fewer bleeding complications. Finally, the combination of aspirin, clopidogrel, and low-dose rivaroxaban has recently been approved by the European Medicines Agency (but not the Food and Drug Administration) for secondary prevention after ACS. Several strategies have been developed to balance the potential benefit of antithrombotic therapy against the risk of bleeding complications, for example, radial access in coronary angiography or restricted use of combination therapy, and others are under investigation, such as discontinuation of aspirin. This overview summarizes the current status of antithrombotic therapy in ACS and describes strategies currently explored to optimize its benefit/risk ratio.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available