4.5 Article

Rationale and design of the Cangrelor versus standard therapy to acHieve optimal Management of Platelet InhibitiON PHOENIX trial

Journal

AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 163, Issue 5, Pages 768-+

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.02.018

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Medicines Company
  2. Bayer
  3. Sanofi-Aventis
  4. Boehringer Ingleheim
  5. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  6. Daiichi Sankyo
  7. Eli Lilly
  8. GlaxoSmithKline
  9. Johnson and Johnson
  10. Merck
  11. Novartis
  12. Portola Pharmaceuticals
  13. Pozen
  14. Regado
  15. GSK
  16. Astra Zeneca
  17. Merck Sharpe Dohme
  18. Schering Plough
  19. Roche
  20. Pfizer
  21. NIH
  22. NYU School of Medicine
  23. Sanofi
  24. Servier
  25. Ablynx
  26. Amarin
  27. Amgen
  28. Astellas
  29. Boehringer-Ingelheim
  30. Daiichi-Sankyo/Eli Lilly alliance
  31. Eisai
  32. Medtronic
  33. Otsuka
  34. BMS/Sanofi Aventis
  35. Accumetrics
  36. AstraZeneca
  37. Ethicon
  38. Significant
  39. BMS
  40. Portola

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Despite robust efficacy in the reduction of ischemic events in patients who require percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), current P2Y(12) inhibitors have limitations. In particular, they require hours to be effective, and they can only be administered orally. Cangrelor is an intravenous, potent, and reversible P2Y12 inhibitor with fast onset and offset of action. We designed CHAMPION PHOENIX to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cangrelor in patients with atherosclerosis undergoing PCI. Trial Design The CHAMPION PHOENIX is a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, superiority trial comparing cangrelor with clopidogrel standard of care in approximately 10,900 patients who have not previously received a P2Y12 inhibitor and who require PCI, including patients with stable angina and with acute coronary syndromes (with or without ST-segment elevation). The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate that cangrelor will reduce the incidence of the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), ischemia-driven revascularization, or stent thrombosis in the 48 hours after randomization compared with clopidogrel without excessive periprocedural bleeding. The key secondary objective is to demonstrate that cangrelor will reduce the incidence of stent thrombosis. Myocardial infarction will be defined according to the universal MI definition, adapting the definition of PCI-related (type 4a) MI. Bleeding will be assessed according to the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction, GUSTO, and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) scales. Conclusion The CHAMPION PHOENIX may establish the role of cangrelor in the care of patients who require PCI across the spectrum of stable and unstable coronary diseases in the setting of current treatment strategies. (Am Heart J 2012;163:768-776.e2.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available