4.5 Article

Novel biomarkers in cardiovascular disease: Update 2010

Journal

AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 160, Issue 4, Pages 583-594

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.06.010

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. German Heart Foundation
  2. Accumetrics
  3. Astra-Zeneca
  4. Bayer Healthcare
  5. Beckman Coulter
  6. Biosite
  7. BRAHMS
  8. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  9. CV Therapeutics
  10. Daichii Sankyo Ltd
  11. Eli Lilly and Co
  12. GlaxoSmithKline
  13. Merck and Company
  14. Nanosphere
  15. Novartis Pharmaceuticals
  16. OrthoClinical Diagnostics
  17. Pfizer
  18. Roche Diagnostics
  19. Sanofi-Aventis
  20. Sanofi-Synthelabo
  21. Schering-Plough
  22. Siemens
  23. Singulex

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rapid evaluation of patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of an acute coronary syndrome is of great clinical relevance. Biomarkers have become increasingly important in this setting to supplement electrocardiographic findings and patient history because one or both can be misleading. Today, cardiac troponin is still the only marker used routinely in this setting due to its myocardial tissue specificity and sensitivity, as well as its established usefulness for therapeutic decision making. However, even current generation troponin assays have certain limitations such as insufficient sensitivity for diagnosing unstable angina. Novel high-sensitivity assays for cardiac troponin have the potential to overcome these limitations. Further studies are needed to answer some critical questions regarding the best cutoffs for diagnosis and risk assessment and the optimal work-up for rule-out of acute myocardial infarction. Other nonmyocardial tissue-specific markers might help in this setting. Myeloperoxidase, copeptin, and growth differentiation factor 15 reflect different aspects of the development of atherosclerosis or acute ischemia. Each has demonstrated impact in risk stratification of acute coronary syndromes. Limited data also show that copeptin may, when used together with cardiac troponin, improve the sensitivity for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction, and growth differentiation factor 15 may help in selection of patients that benefit from invasive therapy. Further evaluation is needed before these markers can be adopted routinely in clinical practice. (Am Heart J 2010; 160: 583-94.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available