4.5 Article

Preoperative angiotensin-blocking drug therapy is not associated with atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery

Journal

AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 160, Issue 2, Pages 329-U146

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.05.033

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Atrial Fibrillation Innovation Center
  2. Fondation Leducq
  3. National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), National Institutes of Health (NIH) [RR024990]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Preoperative use of angiotensin-blocking drug therapy (ABDT) with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers and its link to occurrence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF), a common marker of poor outcomes after cardiac surgery, remain controversial. Methods From 1997 to 2003, 10,552 patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with or without valve surgery. To adjust for differences of clinical characteristics between patients who received ABDT within 24 hours before surgery compared with those who did not, propensity score analyses were conducted. Results Angiotensin-blocking drug therapy was prescribed in 4,795 (45%) before surgery, of which 1,725 (36%) developed POAF before discharge versus 1,908 (33%) of 5,757 patients who did not receive ABDT (unadjusted odds ratio 1.13, 95% CI 1.05-1.25, P < .01). In 6,744 propensity score-matched patients with well-balanced comorbidity profiles, ABDT was not associated with POAF (odds ratio 1.05, CI 0.95-1.16, P = .38). Stratified analysis within quintiles of propensity score and propensity-adjusted logistic multivariable regression confirmed these findings. Conclusions In this large observational study, we found no evidence of an association between preoperative angiotensin blockade and the occurrence of POAF. Adequately powered randomized studies are needed to clarify the best strategy of perioperative ABDT in patients with and without guideline-based indications. (Am Heart J 2010;160:329-336.e1.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available