4.5 Article

Pharmacogenomics of antihypertensive drugs: Rationale and design of the Pharmacogenomic Evaluation of Antihypertensive Responses (PEAR) study

Journal

AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 157, Issue 3, Pages 442-449

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.11.018

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD) [U01-GM074492]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Selection of anti hypertensive therapy is often empiric, and use of genetic information to guide drug therapy selection holds future promise. Trial design The objective of this trial is to identify the genetic determinants of the anti hypertensive and adverse metabolic responses to a thiazide diuretic (hydrochlorothiazide), a beta-blocker (atenolol), and their combination. This will be accomplished through candidate gene and genome-wide association approaches. Individuals with uncomplicated hypertension (N = 800), with ages 17 and 65 years, are being enrolled. Current antihypertensive therapy is discontinued, and hypertension is confirmed, along with collection of other baseline data. Subjects are then randomized to either hydrochlorothiazide or atenolol, with I dose titration step, followed by assessment of response to therapy after at least 6 weeks on the target dose. Those with blood pressure >120/70 mm Hg have the second drug added, with similar dose titration and response assessment procedures. Data collected include home, office, and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure. Biological samples collected in the fasting state include plasma, serum, DNA (buffy coat), and urine. Epstein-Barr virus transformed lymphocyte cell lines are also being created. Conclusions Pharmacogenetic-guided therapy holds clinical potential for hypertension, but the literature in the field is limited. This trial will add substantially to our understanding of the genetic determinants of anti hypertensive and adverse metabolic responses to 2 commonly used antihypertensive drug classes. (Am Heart J 2009; 157:442-9.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available