Journal
POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 1-+Publisher
WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00260.x
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- NICHD NIH HHS [R24 HD041028, R24 HD042828-10, R01 HD047289, R01 HD047289-01A2, R24 HD042828] Funding Source: Medline
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Images and interpretations of the past, present, and future of the American racial and ethnic landscape are contradictory. Many accounts focus on the increasing diversity that results from immigration and differential natural increase as well as the proliferation of racial and ethnic categories in census data. Less attention has been paid to the formation and erosion of racial and ethnic identities produced by intermarriage and ethnic blending. The framers and custodians of census racial classifications assume a geographic origins definition of race and ethnicity, but the de facto measures in censuses and social surveys rely on folk categories that vary over time and are influenced by administrative practices and sociopolitical movements. We illustrate these issues through an in-depth examination of the racial and ethnic reporting by whites, blacks, Asians, and Hispanics in the 2000 census. The emerging pattern, labeled here as the Americanization of racial and ethnic identities, and most evident for whites and blacks, is of simplified racial identities with little acknowledgment of complex ancestries. National origin is the predominant mode of reporting racial and ethnic identities among Asians and Hispanics, especially first-generation immigrants. The future of racial and ethnic identities is unknowable, but continued high levels of immigration, intermarriage, and social mobility are likely to blur contemporary divisions and boundaries.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available