4.0 Article

Early Eocene 40Ar/39Ar age for the Pampa de Jones plant, frog, and insect biota (Huitrera Formation, Neuquen Province, Patagonia, Argentina)

Journal

AMEGHINIANA
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages 207-216

Publisher

ASOCIACION PALEONTOLOGICA ARGENTINA
DOI: 10.5710/AMGH.v47i2.7

Keywords

Early Eocene; Huitrera Formation; Geochronology; Paleobotany; Patagonia; Neuquen; Argentina

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-0345750, DEB 0919071]
  2. Division Of Environmental Biology
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences [0919071] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Pampa de Jones fossil site, a stratigraphically isolated roadcut near the northeastern shore of Nahuel Huapi Lake in Neuquen Province, Argentina, holds a rich fossil biota including a macroflora, a microflora, insects, and most famously, an ontogenetic series of pipid frogs. The site exposes tuffaceous mudstone and sandstone beds of probable lacustrine origin, considered to belong to the volcanic Huitrera Formation. However, there have been no reliable age constraints for the fossil assemblage. We undertook laser fusion analyses of sanidine and biotite crystals occurring in a tuff layer found 4.4 m above the main fossil horizon. Twenty-eight sanidine crystals yielded an 40Ar/39Ar age of 54.24 +/- 0.45 Ma that is preferred over our biotite age of 53.64 +/- 0.35 Ma. Pampa de Jones is thus the oldest well-dated Eocene fossil site in Patagonia, predating two other recently 40Ar/39Ar-dated sites: Laguna del Hunco (51.91 +/- 0.22 Ma) and Rio Pichileufu (47.46 +/- 0.05 Ma). The improved age control makes possible a finer scale of evolutionary hypothesis testing and turnover analysis in the region. The age is concordant with the site's placement in the Huitrera Formation and a depositional origin related to Early Paleogene arc volcanism, and it correlates to an interval of significant climate fluctuations following the Paleocene-Eocene boundary.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available