4.6 Article

Urban Transitions: On Urban Resilience and Human-Dominated Ecosystems

Journal

AMBIO
Volume 39, Issue 8, Pages 531-545

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9

Keywords

Urban resilience; Ecosystem services; Social-ecological processes; Cross-scale interactions; Urban innovation; New Orleans; Cape Town; Phoenix

Funding

  1. Formas (Urban-NET)
  2. Vetenskapsra det (Swedish Links)
  3. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci
  4. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [948993] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences
  6. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [951366] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Urbanization is a global multidimensional process paired with increasing uncertainty due to climate change, migration of people, and changes in the capacity to sustain ecosystem services. This article lays a foundation for discussing transitions in urban governance, which enable cities to navigate change, build capacity to withstand shocks, and use experimentation and innovation in face of uncertainty. Using the three concrete case cities-New Orleans, Cape Town, and Phoenix-the article analyzes thresholds and cross-scale interactions, and expands the scale at which urban resilience has been discussed by integrating the idea from geography that cities form part of system of cities (i.e., they cannot be seen as single entities). Based on this, the article argues that urban governance need to harness social networks of urban innovation to sustain ecosystem services, while nurturing discourses that situate the city as part of regional ecosystems. The article broadens the discussion on urban resilience while challenging resilience theory when addressing human-dominated ecosystems. Practical examples of harnessing urban innovation are presented, paired with an agenda for research and policy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available