4.7 Article

Time course of brain volume changes in the preclinical phase of Alzheimer's disease

Journal

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages 143-151

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.08.279

Keywords

Alzheimer disease; Preclinical phase; Medial temporal lobe; Magnetic resonance imaging; Voxel-based morphometry; Longitudinal

Funding

  1. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale
  2. Direction Generale de la Sante, MGEN, Institut de la Longevite, Conseils Regionaux d' Aquitaine et Bourgogne, Fondation de France
  3. Ministry of Research-INSERM Programme Cohortes et collections de donnees biologiques
  4. ANR [2007LVIE 003]
  5. Fondation Plan Alzheimer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Structural alterations of a large network characterize Alzheimer's disease (AD), but the time course of these changes remains unclear. The dynamic of these alterations was examined in the AD preclinical phase using data from the 10-year follow-up of a population-based cohort (Bordeaux-3 City). Methods: Participants received neuropsychological assessments every 2 years and two identical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exams at baseline and 4 years later. Twenty-five incident AD cases were compared with 319 subjects who remained free of dementia. Subjects were free of dementia at baseline and at follow-up MRI. Incident AD occurred after these time points. Results: At baseline, incident AD already presented smaller volumes only in the left amygdalohippocampal complex. Moreover, a higher annual rate of atrophy of the temporoparietal cortices was observed in future AD subjects during the following 4 years. Conclusion: Incident AD cases present mediotemporal lesions up to 5 years before diagnosis. This neurodegenerative process seems to progressively reach the temporoparietal cortices in the AD preclinical phase. (C) 2014 The Alzheimer's Association. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available