4.7 Article

Changes in plasma amyloid beta in a longitudinal study of aging and Alzheimer's disease

Journal

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 53-61

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.12.006

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; Amyloid-beta; Biomarkers; Diagnosis; Pittsburgh compound B; Positron emission tomography

Funding

  1. CSIRO
  2. Science Industry and Endowment Fund
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) via the Dementia Collaborative Research Centres program (DCRC2)
  4. Victorian government
  5. Pfizer International
  6. Innogenetics-Fujirebio (Ghent, Belgium)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: A practical biomarker is required to facilitate the preclinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods: Plasma amyloid beta (A beta)(1-40), A beta(1-42), A beta(n-40), and A beta(n-42) peptides were measured at baseline and after 18 months in 771 participants from the Australian Imaging Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study of aging. A beta peptide levels were compared with clinical pathology, neuroimaging and neuropsychological measurements. Results: Although inflammatory and renal function covariates influenced plasma A beta levels significantly, a decrease in A beta(1-42)/A beta(1-40) was observed in patients with AD, and was also inversely correlated with neocortical amyloid burden. During the 18 months, plasma A beta(1-42) decreased in subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and in those transitioning from healthy to MCI. Conclusion: Our findings are consistent with a number of published plasma A beta studies and, although the prognostic value of individual measures in any given subject is limited, the diagnostic contribution of plasma A beta may demonstrate utility when combined with a panel of peripheral biomarkers. (C) 2014 The Alzheimer's Association. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available