4.6 Article

Myocardial viability for decision-making concerning revascularization in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of non-randomized and randomized studies

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 182, Issue -, Pages 494-499

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.01.025

Keywords

Coronary artery disease; Revascularization; Myocardial viability

Funding

  1. ECLA Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Myocardial viability tests have been proposed as a key factor in the decision-making process concerning coronary revascularization procedures in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and coronary artery disease (LVD-CAD). Methods: We performed a systematic review andmeta-analysis of studies that compared medical treatment with revascularization in patients with viable and non-viable myocardium and recorded mortality as outcome. Results: Thirty-two non-randomized (4328 patients) and 4 randomized (1079 patients) studies were analyzed. In non-randomized studies, revascularization provided a significant mortality benefit compared with medical treatment (p < 0.05). Since the heterogeneity was significant (p < 0.05) a viability subgroup analysis was performed, showing that revascularization provided a significant mortality benefit compared with medical treatment in patients with viable myocardium(p < 0.05) but not in patients without (p = 0.34). There was a significant subgroup effect (p < 0.05) related to the intensity of the effect, but not to the direction. In randomized studies, revascularization did not provide a significant mortality benefit compared with medical treatment in either patients with viable myocardium or those without (p = 0.21). There was no significant subgroup effect (p = 0.72). Neither non-randomized nor randomized studies demonstrated any significant difference in outcomes between patients with and without viable myocardium. Conclusions: The available data are inconclusive regarding the usefulness of myocardial viability tests for the decision-making process concerning revascularization in LVD-CAD patients. Patients with viable myocardium appear to benefit from revascularization, but similar benefits were observed in patients without viable myocardium. Moreover, a neutral or adverse effect of revascularization cannot be excluded in either group of patients. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available