4.7 Article

Longitudinal, region-specific course of diffusion tensor imaging measures in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease

Journal

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages 519-528

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.05.2186

Keywords

Longitudinal; Alzheimer's disease; DTI; Anisotropy; Diffusivity

Funding

  1. GlaxoSmithKline
  2. National Institute on Aging [P50-AG005146, P50-AG021334, R21 AG033774]
  3. National Institutes of Health [R21AG033774, P50AG005146]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is a promising method for identifying significant cross-sectional differences of white-matter tracts in normal controls (NC) and those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or Alzheimer's disease (AD). There have not been many studies establishing its longitudinal utility. Methods: Seventy-five participants (25 NC, 25 amnestic MCI, and 25 AD) had 3-Tesla MRI scans and clinical evaluations at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months. Fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) were analyzed at each time-point and longitudinally in eight a priori selected areas taken from four regions of interest (ROIs). Results: Cross-sectionally, MD values were higher, and FA values lower in the fornix and splenium of the AD group compared with either MCI or NC (P <.01). Within-group change was more evident in MD than in FA over 12 months: MD increased in the inferior, anterior cingulum, and fornix in both the MCI and AD groups (P <.01). Conclusions: There were stable, cross-sectional, region-specific differences between the NC and AD groups in both FA and MD at each time-point over 12 months. Longitudinally, MD was a better indicator of change than FA. Significant increases of fornix MD in the MCI group suggest this is an early indicator of progression. (C) 2013 The Alzheimer's Association. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available