4.7 Article

Appropriate use criteria for amyloid PET: A report of the Amyloid Imaging Task Force, the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, and the Alzheimer's Association

Journal

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages E1-E16

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.01.002

Keywords

Guidelines; AUC; Imaging; Amyloid; MCI; Alzheimer's; PET; Florbetapir; Biomarker; Beta-amyloid; Dementia; Radiopharmaceutical

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [P30 AG010124] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [R01 AG037497, P01 AG036694, P50 AG005134, R01 AG027435] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIA NIH HHS [P50 AG005134, R01 AG027435, P30 AG019610, P01 AG004953, R01 AG037497] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Positron emission tomography (PET) of brain amyloid beta is a technology that is becoming more available, but its clinical utility in medical practice requires careful definition. To provide guidance to dementia care practitioners, patients, and caregivers, the Alzheimer's Association and the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging convened the Amyloid Imaging Taskforce (AIT). The AIT considered a broad range of specific clinical scenarios in which amyloid PET could potentially be used appropriately. Peer-reviewed, published literature was searched to ascertain available evidence relevant to these scenarios, and the AIT developed a consensus of expert opinion. Although empirical evidence of impact on clinical outcomes is not yet available, a set of specific appropriate use criteria (AUC) were agreed on that define the types of patients and clinical circumstances in which amyloid PET could be used. Both appropriate and inappropriate uses were considered and formulated, and are reported and discussed here. Because both dementia care and amyloid PET technology are in active development, these AUC will require periodic reassessment. Future research directions are also outlined, including diagnostic utility and patient-centered outcomes. (C) 2013 The Alzheimer's Association. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available