4.6 Review

Multicenter trials, guidelines, and uncertainties - Do we know as much as we think we do?

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 187, Issue -, Pages 600-603

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.004

Keywords

Acute coronary syndromes; Hierarchical modelling; Conflicts of interest

Funding

  1. FRQS (Fonds de recherche du Quebec - Sante)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is an uncritical belief that positive large scale multicenter randomized clinical trials provide a definitive window to the truth. The limitations and difficulties in performing large trials are discussed herein and the need to fully and transparently acknowledge residual uncertainties is stressed. For example, the failure to consider the regional variations that may arise with the outsourcing of trials may lead to false estimates of precision. As large trials form the backbone of guidelines, failure to critically evaluate the importance of evidential limitations may see a minimization of residual uncertainties and lead to inappropriate recommendations. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available