4.2 Article

Emotional self-regulation, peer rejection, and antisocial behavior: Developmental associations from early childhood to early adolescence

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages 356-365

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.016

Keywords

Self-regulation; Emotion regulation; Peer relationships; Antisocial behavior; Developmental psychopathology

Funding

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [K05 DA025630, R01 DA026222] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH050907-15, R01 MH050907] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined relations among emotional self-regulation, peer rejection, and antisocial behavior in a sample of 122 boys from low-income families who participated in a summer camp and were followed longitudinally from early childhood to early adolescence. Emotional self-regulation strategies were coded in early childhood from a waiting task, measures of peer rejection were collected during middle childhood at the summer camp, and reports of antisocial behavior were obtained during early adolescence. Structural equation modeling was utilized to examine longitudinal relations among these constructs, with results supporting a negative association between use of active distraction and peer rejection and a positive association between peer rejection and antisocial behavior. Furthermore, an indirect effect of active distraction on antisocial behavior was found through peer rejection. Thus, adaptive self-regulation strategy use in early childhood demonstrated direct longitudinal relations with peer rejection and an indirect association with antisocial behavior in early adolescence. Results have implications for early prevention and intervention efforts to foster adaptive self-regulation of emotion and reduce risk for later social problems and delinquency. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available