4.7 Article

The extended X-ray emission around HDF 130 at z=1.99: an inverse Compton ghost of a giant radio source in the Chandra Deep Field-North

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 395, Issue 1, Pages L67-L70

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00644.x

Keywords

galaxies: individual: RGJ123617; intergalactic medium; X-rays: galaxies; X-rays: galaxies: clusters

Funding

  1. Royal Society [SP8-9003B]
  2. STFC [PP/E00105X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/E00105X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One of the six extended X-ray sources found in the Chandra Deep Field-North is centred on Hubble Deep Field (HDF) 130, which has recently been shown to be a massive galaxy at z = 1.99 with a compact radio nucleus. The X-ray source has a roughly double-lobed structure with each lobe about 41-arcsec long, or 345 kpc at the redshift of HDF 130. We have analysed the 2 Ms X-ray image and spectrum of the source and find that it is well fit by a power-law continuum of photon index 2.65 and has a 2-10 keV luminosity of 5.4 x 10(43) erg s(-1) ( if at z = 1.99). Any further extended emission within a radius of 60 arcsec has a luminosity less than half this value, which is contrary to what is expected from a cluster of galaxies. The source is best explained as an inverse Compton ghost of a giant radio source, which is no longer being powered, and for which Compton losses have downgraded the energetic electrons, gamma > 10(4), required for high-frequency radio emission. The lower energy electrons, gamma similar to 1000, produce X-rays by inverse Compton scattering on the cosmic microwave background. Depending on the magnetic field strength, some low-frequency radio emission may remain. Further inverse Compton ghosts may exist in the Chandra Deep Fields and beyond.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available