4.1 Article

The Role of Cerebellar Volume in Cognition in the General Elderly Population

Journal

ALZHEIMER DISEASE & ASSOCIATED DISORDERS
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages 352-357

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000024

Keywords

cerebellum; aging; magnetic resonance imaging; cognition; population-based

Funding

  1. Health Research and Development Council (ZonMW)
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [918-46-615, 904-61-096, 904-61-133]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: It is unknown whether the cerebellum affects cognitive function in an aging community-dwelling population. In a population-based study on 3745 nondemented individuals aged 45 years and above, we investigated the relationship between cerebellar volume and cognitive function. Methods: Brain volumes were obtained using automatic tissue segmentation of magnetic resonance imaging scans. Cognitive functioning was assessed using MMSE and cognitive compound scores of global cognition, executive function, information processing speed, memory, and motor speed. Linear regression modeling was used to study the associations between cerebellar volumes and cognitive measures, independent of cerebral volumes. Results: We found a relationship between larger cerebellar volume and better global cognition, executive function, information processing speed, and motor speed. After adjustment for cerebral volume, only cerebellar gray matter volume remained borderline significantly associated with global cognition and information processing speed. After Bonferroni correction, the few associations found between cerebellar volume and cognition disappeared. Conclusions: We only found a minor relationship between larger cerebellar volume and better cognition in healthy older adults, which further attenuated after correcting for cerebral volume. Our findings support the notion that cerebellar volume has an influence on cognition in aging, but that it is not the major leading structure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available