4.1 Review

Missed and Delayed Diagnosis of Dementia in Primary Care Prevalence and Contributing Factors

Journal

ALZHEIMER DISEASE & ASSOCIATED DISORDERS
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 306-314

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e3181a6bebc

Keywords

dementia; diagnostic errors; primary care

Funding

  1. NIH K23 career development award [K23CA125585]
  2. Houston VA HSR&D Center of Excellence [HFP90-020]
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [K23CA125585] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dementia is a growing public health problem for which early detection may be beneficial. Currently, the diagnosis of dementia in primary care is dependent mostly on clinical suspicion on the basis of patient symptoms or caregivers' concerns and is prone to be missed or delayed. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to ascertain the prevalence and contributing factors for missed and delayed dementia diagnoses in primary care. Prevalence of missed and delayed diagnosis was estimated by abstracting quantitative data from studies of diagnostic sensitivity among primary care providers. Possible predictors and contribution factory factors were determined from the text of quantitative and qualitative Studies of patient, caregiver, provider, and system-related barriers. Overall estimates of diagnostic sensitivity varied among studies and seemed to be in part a function of dementia severity, degree of patient impairment, dementia subtype, and frequency of patient-provider contact. Major contributory factors included problems with attitudes and patient-provider communication, educational deficits. and system resource constraints. The true prevalence of missed and delayed diagnoses of dementia is unknown but seems to be high. Until the case for dementia screening becomes more compelling, efforts to promote timely detection should focus on removing barriers to diagnosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available