4.1 Article

Characteristics and Performance of a Modified Version of the ADCS-CGIC CIBIC plus for Mild Cognitive Impairment Clinical Trials

Journal

ALZHEIMER DISEASE & ASSOCIATED DISORDERS
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 260-267

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e31819cb760

Keywords

mild cognitive impairment; Alzheimer disease; dementia; global impression of change; rating scales; donepezil; vitamin E; clinical trials

Funding

  1. NIH [U01 AG 10483, R01 AG019241]
  2. Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study [P50 AG 05142]
  3. University of Southern California Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (ADRC) [P30 AG28383]
  4. University of Kentucky Alzheimer's Disease Center
  5. University of Kentucky PREADViSE trial [P50 AG 10124]
  6. University of Pennsylvania Alzheimer's Disease Center [P50 AG 05681, P01 AG 03991]
  7. Washington University Alzheimer's Disease Research Center [P30 AG 08051]
  8. New York University School of Medicine Alzheimer's Disease Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) was modified for use in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) trials and tested in the ADCS MCI randomized clinical trial of donepezil, vitamin E, and placebo. We assessed feasibility for its use by determining whether or not: (1) it distinguished a medication effect at 6 months and 12 months, (2) baseline demographic or clinical characteristics predicted change, (3) there was an association between MCI-CGIC and change in other clinical measures in order to evaluate external or concurrent validity. Methods: We used a generalized estimating equations approach for ordinal outcome data to test the effects of treatment, baseline characteristics, and change in clinical measures on the MCI-CGIC over 12 months, and ordinal logistic regression to assess the association between MCI-CGIC and change in clinical measures at 6 months and 12 months. Results: On the MCI-CGIC overall, 12.9% and 10.6% were rated as having improved, and 31.6%, and 39.8% as having worsened over 6 months and 12 months, respectively. The MCI-CGIC did not distinguish the donepezil or vitamin E groups from placebo at 6 and 12 months treatment. Variables at screening or baseline that were associated with worse CGIC scores over 6 and 12 months included white race, greater years of education, worse depression, dementia severity rating, cognitive, and daily activities scores, and lower memory domain scores on a neuropsychological battery. Rate of worsening on the MCI-CGIC over 12 months was associated with change on the Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive and on executive function. Worsening at 6 months and 12 months, separately, were associated with the corresponding change in Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive, Activities of Daily Living, Beck Depression Inventory, Mini-Mental State Examination, Clinical Dementia Rating sum of boxes, memory, and executive function. Conclusions: Change detected by the MCI-CGIC was associated with baseline clinical severity and with change in clinical ratings over 6 and 12 months, supporting the validity of a CGIC approach in MCI. The effect size of the donepezil-placebo difference was similar to that of other outcomes at 12 months. About 40% of MCI patients were judged worse and about 11% improved, consistent with clinical experience and other ratings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available