4.2 Article

Twenty-six-week efficacy and safety study of mometasone furoate/formoterol 200/10 μg combination treatment in patients with persistent asthma previously receiving medium-dose inhaled corticosteroids

Journal

ALLERGY AND ASTHMA PROCEEDINGS
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages 269-279

Publisher

OCEAN SIDE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.2500/aap.2010.31.3364

Keywords

Asthma deteriorations; clinical trial; combination therapy; formoterol; lung function; medium dose; mometasone furoate; quality of life; symptoms; uncontrolled asthma

Categories

Funding

  1. Merck Co
  2. Abbott
  3. Alcon
  4. AstraZeneca
  5. Ception
  6. Dey
  7. Dyax
  8. Genentech
  9. GSK
  10. MAP
  11. Med-Immune
  12. Novartis
  13. Sanofi-aventis
  14. Schering-Plough
  15. Sepracor
  16. TEVA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Asthma is a heterogeneous condition characterized by reduced lung function, chronic inflammation, and periodic asthma deteriorations. This study was performed to evaluate the effect of mometasone furoate (MF)/formoterol (F) combination, 200/10 mu g, administered twice daily (b.i.d.) on asthma deteriorations and pulmonary function in patients with asthma uncontrolled on medium-dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS). After 2- to 3-week open-label run-in with MF 200 mu g b.i.d., patients (>= 12 years) were randomized to 26 weeks of treatment with MF/F 200/10 mu g, MF 200 mu kg, F 10 mu g, or placebo b.i.d. Coprimary end points were time to first asthma deterioration (MF/F versus F) and bronchodilation, assessed by the area under the curve of the change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second 0-12 hours (FEV(1) AUC(0-12h); MF/F versus MF). A total of 781 patients were randomized. Treatment with MF/F 200/10 mu g reduced asthma deteriorations and clinically judged deteriorations (i.e., deterioration resulting in emergency treatment, hospitalization, or treatment with additional excluded asthma medication systemic corticosteroids]). The proportion of patients experiencing asthma deteriorations was MF/F, 30.4%; MF, 33.9%; F, 54.0%; placebo, 55.6% (p < 0.001, MF/F versus F and placebo). There was a sixfold reduction in clinically judged deteriorations with MF/F versus F and placebo (p < 0.001). Lung function improved more rapidly with MF/F than MF and placebo. Mean change from baseline FEV(1) AUC(0-12h), at week 12 was MF/F, 11.7% versus MF, 5.7%; F, 8.5%; and placebo, 3.9% (p < 0.001). Treatment-related AEs were rare and similar across groups. Treatment with MF/F 200/10 mu g was effective in reducing the risk of asthma deteriorations. MF/F was safe and provided rapid and sustained bronchodilation in patients with asthma. (Allergy Asthma Proc 31:269-279, 2010; doi:10.2500/aap.2010.31.3364)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available