4.6 Review

The epidemiology of anaphylaxis in Europe: a systematic review

Journal

ALLERGY
Volume 68, Issue 11, Pages 1353-1361

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/all.12272

Keywords

anaphylaxis; epidemiology; incidence; prevalence; risk factors

Funding

  1. EAACI
  2. Asthma UK [MRC-AsthmaUKCentre] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [G1000758, G1000758B, G0902018] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. MRC [G0902018] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundAnaphylaxis is an acute, potentially fatal, multi-organ system, allergic reaction caused by the release of chemical mediators from mast cells and basophils. Uncertainty exists around epidemiological measures of incidence and prevalence, risk factors, risk of recurrence, and death due to anaphylaxis. This systematic review aimed to (1) understand and describe the epidemiology of anaphylaxis and (2) describe how these characteristics vary by person, place, and time. MethodsUsing a highly sensitive search strategy, we identified systematic reviews of epidemiological studies, descriptive and analytical epidemiological investigations, and studies involving analysis of routine data. ResultsOur searches identified a total of 5843 potentially eligible studies, of which 49 satisfied our inclusion criteria. Of these, three were suitable for pooled estimates of prevalence. The incidence rates for all-cause anaphylaxis ranged from 1.5 to 7.9 per 100000 person-years. These data indicated that an estimated 0.3% (95% CI 0.1-0.5) of the population experience anaphylaxis at some point in their lives. Food, drugs, stinging insects, and latex were the most commonly identified triggers. ConclusionsAnaphylaxis is a common problem, affecting an estimated 1 in 300 of the European population at some time in their lives. Future research needs to focus on better understanding of the trends across Europe and identifying those most likely to experience fatal reactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available