4.6 Article

Chronic urticaria in Chinese population: a hospital-based multicenter epidemiological study

Journal

ALLERGY
Volume 69, Issue 3, Pages 359-364

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/all.12338

Keywords

epidemiology; urticaria

Funding

  1. National Science Found of China [81271754, 81072447]
  2. Clinical Research Found of Third Military Medical University [2010XLC11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundThe epidemiologic profiles of chronic urticaria (CU) vary considerably among regions, and few such data are available from China. MethodsWe performed a multicenter open questionnaire investigation about the clinical and laboratory features of CU, defined as recurrent wheals with/without angioedema lasting for 6weeks, among 3027 patients. ResultsFemale preponderance was observed (female/male ratio, 1.46:1). The mean age at diagnosis was 34.713.8years, and the mean disease duration was 18.5 +/- 46.1months (range, 1.5-127months). Patients were classified as having chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU, 61.0% of patients), physical urticaria (PU, 26.2%), or other urticaria types (OU, 2.3%). Nocturnal attacks were reported by 60% of cases. The Urticaria Activity Score (UAS) in patients with CSU was 3.8 +/- 1.4. The mean Dermatology Life Quality Index was 7.3 +/- 3.4 (range 0-30). Induction or exacerbation of wheals with alcohol drinking was reported by 55.7% of patients. Chronic hepatitis B was less prevalent in our CU patients compared with the general Chinese population (2.7% vs 7%). Positive autologous serum skin tests (ASSTs) were observed in 66.9% of patients. Patients with positive ASST had higher UAS, greater angioedema frequencies, longer disease durations, and poorer QoL compared with patients with negative ASST (P<0.05). ConclusionIn this Chinese population, CU usually affected youth, and CSU was the most common subtype. Autoreactivity and alcohol consumption were the top two triggers for CU, whereas latent infectious and chronic inflammatory diseases were not as common as in previous reports.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available