4.7 Article

Individual patient risk stratification of high-risk neuroblastomas using a two-gene score suited for clinical use

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 137, Issue 4, Pages 868-877

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29461

Keywords

neuroblastoma; prognosis; high-risk; R-score

Categories

Funding

  1. FIS [PI10/15]
  2. RTICC [RD12/0036/0020]
  3. Children Cancer Foundation of Sweden
  4. Swedish Cancer Society
  5. Swedish Research Council
  6. BioCARE
  7. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research
  8. CREATE Health
  9. Strategic Cancer Research Program
  10. Gunnar Nilsson Foundation
  11. Malmo University Hospital
  12. Instituto Carlos III Madrid
  13. ERDF, Spain

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several gene expression-based prognostic signatures have been described in neuroblastoma, but none have successfully been applied in the clinic. Here we have developed a clinically applicable prognostic gene signature, both with regards to number of genes and analysis platform. Importantly, it does not require comparison between patients and is applicable amongst high-risk patients. The signature is based on a two-gene score (R-score) with prognostic power in high-stage tumours (stage 4 and/or MYCN-amplified diagnosed after 18 months of age). QPCR-based and array-based analyses of matched cDNAs confirmed cross platform (array-qPCR) transferability. We also defined a fixed cut-off value identifying prognostically differing subsets of high-risk patients on an individual patient basis. This gene expression signature independently contributes to the current neuroblastoma classification system, and if prospectively validated could provide further stratification of high-risk patients, and potential upfront identification of a group of patients that are in need of new/additional treatment regimens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available