4.7 Article

A retrospective analysis: the development of patient reported outcome measures for the assessment of Crohn's disease activity

Journal

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages 77-86

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apt.13001

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Merck
  2. Abbott Labs
  3. Centocor Inc.
  4. Given Imaging
  5. UCB Pharma
  6. ActoGenix
  7. Boehringer-Ingelheim
  8. Cosmo Technologies
  9. EnGene Inc
  10. Ferring Pharmaceuticals
  11. Millennium Pharmaceuticals
  12. Elan/Biogen
  13. Janssen-Ortho
  14. Teva Pharmaceuticals
  15. Astra Zeneca
  16. Shire
  17. Tillotts Pharma AG
  18. Novonordisk
  19. GSK
  20. Pfizer
  21. Sigmoid Pharma
  22. Novartis Pharmaceuticals
  23. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  24. Genentech
  25. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc.
  26. Celgene
  27. Serono
  28. Unity Pharmaceuticals
  29. Albireo Pharma
  30. Given Imaging Inc.
  31. Salix Pharmaceuticals
  32. Prometheus Therapeutics and Diagnostics
  33. Athersys
  34. Axcan
  35. Gilead
  36. Wyeth
  37. Zealand Pharma
  38. Zyngenia
  39. GiCare Pharma Inc.
  40. Abbott
  41. ActoGeniX NV
  42. AGI Therapeutics Inc
  43. Alba Therapeutics Corp
  44. Albireo
  45. Alfa Wasserman
  46. Amgen
  47. AM-Pharma BV
  48. Anaphore
  49. Astellas
  50. Athersys Inc
  51. Atlantic Healthcare Ltd
  52. Aptalis
  53. BioBalance Corp
  54. Celek Pharmaceuticals
  55. Cellerix SL
  56. Cerimon Pharmaceuticals
  57. ChemoCentryx
  58. CoMentis
  59. Coronado Biosciences
  60. Cytokine Pharmasciences
  61. Eagle Pharmaceuticals
  62. Eli Lilly
  63. Enteromedics
  64. Exagen Diagnostics Inc
  65. Flexio Therapeutics Inc
  66. Funxional Therapeutics Ltd
  67. Genzyme Corp
  68. Gilead Sciences
  69. Human Genome Sciences
  70. Ironwood Pharmaceuticals
  71. KaloBios Pharmaceuticals
  72. Lexicon Pharmaceuticals
  73. Lycera Corp
  74. Meda Pharmaceuticals
  75. Merck Research Laboratories
  76. Merck Serono
  77. Nisshin Kyorin Pharmaceuticals
  78. Novo Nordisk
  79. NPS Pharmaceuticals
  80. Optimer Pharmaceuticals
  81. Orexigen Therapeutics Inc
  82. PDL Biopharma
  83. Procter and Gamble
  84. Prometheus Laboratories
  85. ProtAb Ltd
  86. Purgenesis Technologies Inc
  87. Relypsa Inc
  88. Roche
  89. Salient Pharmaceuticals
  90. Santarus
  91. Schering Plough
  92. Shire Pharmaceuticals
  93. Sigmoid Pharma Ltd
  94. Sirtris Pharmaceuticals
  95. SLA Pharma UK Ltd
  96. Targacept
  97. Therakos
  98. TxCell SA
  99. Viamet Pharmaceuticals
  100. Vascular Biogenics Ltd
  101. Warner Chilcott UK Ltd
  102. Janssen
  103. Milennium Pharmaceuticals
  104. Novartis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundThe Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a measure of disease activity based on symptoms, signs and a laboratory test. The US Food and Drug Administration has indicated that patient reported outcomes (PROs) should be the primary outcome in randomised controlled trials for Crohn's disease (CD). AimAs no validated PRO exists for CD, to investigate whether CDAI diary card items could be modified for this purpose. MethodsData from a trial of rifaximin-extended intestinal release were used to identify cut-points for stool frequency, pain and general well-being using receiver operating characteristic curves with CDAI <150 as criterion. The operating properties of 2- and 3-item PRO were evaluated using data from a trial of methotrexate in CD. Regression analysis determined PRO2 and PRO3 scores that correspond to CDAI-defined thresholds of 150, 220 and 450 and changes of 50, 70 and 100 points. ResultsOptimum cut-points for CDAI remission were mean daily stool frequency 1.5, abdominal pain 1, and general well-being score of 1 (areas under the ROC curve 0.79, 0.91 and 0.89, respectively). The effect estimates were similar using 2- and 3-item PROs or CDAI. PRO2 and PRO3 values corresponding to CDAI scores of 150, 220 and 450 points were 8, 14, 34 and 13, 22, 53. The corresponding values for CDAI changes of 50, 70 and 100, were 2, 5, 8 and 5, 9, 14. Responsiveness to change was similar for both PROs. ConclusionPatient reported outcomes derived from CDAI diary items may be appropriate for use in clinical trials for CD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available