4.7 Article

Randomised clinical trial: simvastatin as adjuvant therapy improves significantly the Helicobacter pylori eradication rate - a placebo-controlled study

Journal

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages 231-238

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2012.05161.x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background The eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori with standard treatments are decreasing worldwide. Aim To determine whether adding simvastatin as adjuvant to triple regimen in patients with H. pylori infection will improve the eradication rate. Methods We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised clinical trial comparing a 7-day, triple eradication regimen consisting of two antibiotics (clarithromycin 500 mg and amoxicillin 1 g, all twice per day) plus a proton pump inhibitor (omeprazole 20 mg twice daily) supplemented with simvastatin 20 mg (CAO + S) or a comparable placebo (CAO + P). Both the simvastatin and the placebo were taken orally twice daily for 1 week in 113 patients with H. pylori infection. The presence of H. pylori was determined by positive rapid urease test and histology. Eradication was confirmed by 13C-urea breath test at least 1 month after treatment. Adverse effects were assessed by questionnaire. Results A total of 113 patients underwent randomisation. Intention-to-treat analysis (ITT; n = 113) eradication rates were: CAO + S (86%; 95% CI: 7892%), CAO + P (69%; 95% CI: 6474%). Per protocol analysis (PP; n = 108) eradication rates were: CAO + S (91%; 95% CI: 8494%), CAO + P (72%; 95% CI: 6578%). Eradication rates were higher with CAO + S than CAO + P in PP and ITT (P = 0.03, P = 0.04 respectively). No differences were demonstrated between the two groups concerning compliance or adverse effects. Conclusion In this randomised clinical trial simvastatin as adjuvant to standard therapy improves significantly the H. pylori eradication rate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available