4.7 Article

Development and analysis of EST-SSRs for flax (Linum usitatissimum L.)

Journal

THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS
Volume 119, Issue 1, Pages 53-63

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-009-1016-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. AAFC A-base project for high-value flax development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A set of 146,611 expressed sequence tags (ESTs) were generated from 10 flax cDNA libraries. After assembly, a total of 11,166 contigs and 11,896 singletons were mined for the presence of putative simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and yielded 806 (3.5%) non-redundant sequences which contained 851 putative SSRs. This is equivalent to one EST-SSR per 16.5 kb of sequence. Trinucleotide motifs were the most abundant (76.9%), followed by dinucleotides (13.9%). Tetra-, penta- and hexanucleotide motifs represented < 10% of the SSRs identified. A total of 83 SSR motifs were identified. Motif (TTC/GAA)n was the most abundant (10.2%) followed by (CTT/AAG)n (8.7%), (TCT/AGA)n (8.6%), (CT/AG)n (6.7%) and (TC/GA)n (5.3%). A total of 662 primer pairs were designed, of which 610 primer pairs yielded amplicons in a set of 23 flax accessions. Polymorphism between the accessions was found for 248 primer pairs which detected a total of 275 EST-SSR loci. Two to seven alleles were detected per marker. The polymorphism information content value for these markers ranged from 0.08 to 0.82 and averaged 0.35. The 635 alleles detected by the 275 polymorphic EST-SSRs were used to study the genetic relationship of 23 flax accessions. Four major clusters and two singletons were observed. Sub-clusters within the main clusters correlated with the pedigree relationships amongst accessions. The EST-SSRs developed herein represent the first large-scale development of SSR markers in flax. They have potential to be used for the development of genetic and physical maps, quantitative trait loci mapping, genetic diversity studies, association mapping and fingerprinting cultivars for example.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available