4.7 Article

Clinical trial: the effects of a fermented milk containing three probiotic bacteria in patients with irritable bowel syndrome - a randomized, double-blind, controlled study

Journal

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages 218-227

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04183.x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. AstraZeneca
  2. Novartis
  3. Albireo
  4. Danone
  5. Movetis Addex
  6. Succampo
  7. Arla Foods Innovation, Stockholm, Sweden
  8. Swedish Medical Research Council [13409]
  9. Faculty of Medicine, University of Goteborg

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P>Background The effects of probiotic bacteria in IBS remain controversial. Aim To study the effects of a probiotic product on IBS symptoms. Methods We randomized 74 IBS patients to receive 8 weeks of daily treatment with 400 mL milk fermented with the yoghurt bacteria and containing Lactobacillus paracasei, ssp. paracasei F19, Lactobacillus acidophilus La5 and Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 (Cultura; active) or acidified milk without these bacteria (control). The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects reporting adequate relief of their IBS symptoms at least 50% of the weeks. IBS symptom severity, psychological symptoms and quality of life were assessed. Results The proportion of responders was 38% (14/37 patients) in the active group and 27% (10/37 patients) in the control group (P = 0.3). IBS symptom severity improved significantly in both groups during the treatment period. This change was greater in the active group during the first 2 weeks, but thereafter, no significant group differences were seen. Conclusions We could not detect a clearly positive effect of fermented milk containing three probiotic bacteria on GI symptoms in IBS patients compared with the control treatment. However, a trend towards a more favourable effect during the first weeks was seen in the active group. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 31, 218-227.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available