4.7 Article

Clinical trial: phase 2 study of lubiprostone for irritable bowel syndrome with constipation

Journal

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 27, Issue 8, Pages 685-696

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03629.x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Analyses of a trial in constipated patients indicated that lubiprostone may be an effective treatment for irritable bowel syndrome with constipation. Aim To assess the efficacy and safety of three lubiprostone doses for irritable bowel syndrome with constipation. Methods 195 irritable bowel syndrome with constipation patients received daily doses of 16 [8 mu g twice daily (b.d.)], 32 (16 mu g b.d.) or 48 mu g (24 mu g b.d.) lubiprostone or placebo b.d. for 3 months. Gastrointestinal parameters were recorded in diaries daily by patients. Results After 1 month, lubiprostone showed significantly greater improvements in mean abdominal discomfort/pain scores vs. placebo (P = 0.023). After 2 months, all lubiprostone groups showed significantly greater improvements in mean abdominal discomfort/pain scores (P <= 0.039). After 3 months of treatment, the improvement in each lubiprostone arm was greater than placebo, but the test for trend was no longer significant. Treatment with lubiprostone showed significantly higher rates of gastrointestinal adverse events (P = 0.020), especially diarrhoea and nausea. Conclusion Lubiprostone significantly improved gastrointestinal symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation at all doses. Higher doses of lubiprostone, especially the 48 mu g/day group, were associated with more gastrointestinal adverse events. From these data, the 16 mu g/day dose demonstrated the optimal combination of efficacy and safety. These results warrant further study of lubiprostone for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available