4.2 Article

Exploring the Role of Central Astrocytic Glutamate Uptake in Ethanol Reward inMice

Journal

ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 38, Issue 5, Pages 1307-1314

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acer.12361

Keywords

Ethanol; Astrocyte; Glutamate; Drinking in the Dark; Place Preference

Funding

  1. NIAAA [R03AA019577]
  2. Shervert Frazier Research Institute
  3. Englehard Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundAlcoholism is associated with specific brain abnormalities revealed through postmortem studies, including a reduction in glial cell number and dysregulated glutamatergic neurotransmission. Whether these abnormalities contribute to the etiology of alcoholism, are consequences of alcohol use, or both is still unknown. MethodsWe investigated the role of astrocytic glutamate uptake in ethanol (EtOH) binge drinking in mice, using the drinking in the dark (DID) paradigm by blocking the astrocytic glutamate transporter (GLT-1) with intracerebroventricular (ICV) administration of dihydrokainic acid (DHK). To determine whether astrocytic glutamate uptake regulates the conditioned rewarding effects of EtOH, we examined the effects of ICV DHK on the acquisition and expression of EtOH-induced conditioned place preference. ResultsBlocking central astrocytic glutamate uptake selectively attenuated EtOH binge drinking behavior in mice. DHK did not alter the acquisition or expression of preference for EtOH-associated cues, indicating that reduced astrocytic glutamate trafficking may decrease binge-like drinking without altering the conditioned rewarding effects of EtOH. ConclusionsSeveral alternative conclusions are plausible, however, interpreting these data in the context of the human literature, these findings suggest that the reduction of glia in the alcoholic brain may not be a predisposing factor to developing alcoholism and could be a consequence of EtOH toxicity that decreases excessive EtOH intake.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available