4.2 Article

Neural and Behavioral Mechanisms of Impulsive Choice in Alcohol Use Disorder

Journal

ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 35, Issue 7, Pages 1209-1219

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01455.x

Keywords

Delay Discounting; Intertemporal Choice; Impulsivity; Delayed Gratification

Funding

  1. National Institute on Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse [AA012238, AA014886]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Alcohol dependence has repeatedly been associated with impulsive choice, or the inability to choose large delayed rewards over smaller, but more immediate rewards. However, the neural basis of impulsive choice in alcohol use disorders (AUDs) is not well understood. Methods: One hundred fifty-one individuals with a range of alcohol use from social drinking to severe alcohol dependence completed a delay discounting task while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging. Participants received customized trials designed to ensure an approximately equivalent number of immediate responses. Results: Delaying gratification recruited regions involved in cognitive control, conflict monitoring, and the interpretation of somatic states. Individuals with more severe alcohol use problems showed increased discounting of delayed rewards and greater activation in several regions including supplementary motor area, insula/orbitofrontal cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, and the precuneus. Conclusions: These results suggest that impulsive choice in alcohol dependence is the result of functional anomolies in widely distributed, but interconnected brain regions involved in cognitive and emotional control. Furthermore, our results suggest that the neural mechanisms of impulsive choice in AUD both overlaps with that observed in previous studies, and shows that individuals with AUD recruit additional mechanisms when making intertemporal choices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available