3.9 Article

Breast Cancer Subtypes Based on ER/PR and Her2 Expression: Comparison of Clinicopathologic Features and Survival

Journal

CLINICAL MEDICINE & RESEARCH
Volume 7, Issue 1-2, Pages 4-13

Publisher

MARSHFIELD CLINIC
DOI: 10.3121/cmr.2009.825

Keywords

Breast cancer subtype; Survival; Treatment; Estrogen/progesterone receptor; Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 ( HER2/neu); Immunohistochemistry; Triple negative

Funding

  1. Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation Disease Specific Restricted Funds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To compare the clinicopathologic features and survival in the four breast cancer subtypes defined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) expression of estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2): ER/ PR+, Her2+; ER/ PR+, Her2-; ER/ PR-, Her2+; and ER/ PR-, Her2-. Methods: A 7-year retrospective study of 1134 invasive breast cancer subjects. Clinical and pathologic features and survival of the four subtypes were compared. Results: Using ER/ PR+ and Her2-as a reference, ER/PR-, Her2-had the worst overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-3.2) and the worst disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.8-3.0). In ER/ PR+, Her2-, chemotherapy conferred significant overall and disease-free survival advantages. Subtype comparison revealed statistically significant differences in outcomes. Conclusion: The triple negative subtype has the worst overall and disease free survival. Efforts should be directed at standardization of current testing methods and development of more reliable and reproducible testing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available