4.2 Article

Parietal Gray Matter Volume Loss Is Related to Spatial Processing Deficits in Long-Term Abstinent Alcoholic Men

Journal

ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 33, Issue 10, Pages 1806-1814

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.01019.x

Keywords

Alcohol Abstinence; Structural MRI; Brain Shrinkage; Gray Matter; Parietal Lobe

Funding

  1. NIAAA [AA11311, AA13659]
  2. NIDA [HHSN271200688434C]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: We previously demonstrated relatively intact cognitive function (with the exception of suggestive evidence for persistent deficits in spatial information processing) in middle-aged long-term abstinent alcoholics (LTAA, abstinent for 6 months or more) compared to age and gender comparable nonalcoholic controls (NAC) (Fein et al., 2006). Methods: In the current study, we examine cortical gray matter volumes in the same samples to determine whether gray matter volumes in LTAA are consistent with the cognitive results - i.e., exhibiting gray matter volumes comparable to NAC in most brain regions, except for possible indications of persistent shrinkage in the parietal lobe subserving spatial information processing. Results: We found gray matter shrinkage in LTAA in the parietal lobe consistent with the spatial processing deficits in this same sample. More compelling, in LTAA, the magnitude of parietal gray matter shrinkage was negatively associated with spatial processing domain performance and positively associated with alcohol dose. Gray matter volume deficits were present in the occipital and other cortical tissue, but poorer visuospatial test performance correlated significantly with smaller volumes in the parietal cortex only. Conclusions: Taken together, the cognitive and structural imaging data provide compelling evidence that chronic alcohol abuse results in shrinkage of the parietal cortex with associated deficits in spatial information processing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available