4.1 Article

Circadian Clock Gene Polymorphisms in Alcohol Use Disorders and Alcohol Consumption

Journal

ALCOHOL AND ALCOHOLISM
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages 303-311

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agq035

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Yrjo Jahnsson Foundation [6113]
  2. Academy of Finland [210262]
  3. Academy of Finland (AKA) [210262, 210262] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: Circadian clock genes are involved in the development of drug-induced behaviors and regulate neurotransmission pathways in addiction. Our aim was to study whether circadian clock gene polymorphisms predispose to alcohol dependence or abuse or other alcohol-related characteristics. Methods: The study sample comprised of 512 individuals having alcohol dependence or alcohol abuse (according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV)) and their 511 age- and sex-matched controls. This population-based sample was drawn from a cohort (n = 7415), representative of the Finnish general population aged 30 and over. Altogether 42 single-nucleotide polymorphisms of 19 genes related to the circadian pacemaker system were genotyped. Results: ARNTL rs6486120 T+ allelic status (P = 0.0007, q = 0.17), ADCYAP1 rs2856966 GG genotype (P = 0.0006, q = 0.17) and VIP CC haplotype (rs3823082-rs688136) (P = 0.0006) were suggestively associated with alcohol consumption in socially drinking controls. ARNTL2 GT haplotype (rs7958822-rs4964057) associated suggestively with alcohol abuse diagnosis (P = 0.0013). Earlier findings on the associations of DRD2 and NPY with alcohol dependence were supported: DRD2/ANKK1 Taq1A(1) increased (P = 0.04) and NPY Pro7 decreased (P = 0.01) the risk of alcohol dependence. Conclusions: ARNTL, ARNTL2, VIP and ADCYAP1 were indicated as having influence on alcohol use or abuse. The role of DRD2 and NPY on alcohol dependence was also supported.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available