4.0 Article

Knowledge of and Opinions on HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Among Front-Line Service Providers at Canadian AIDS Service Organizations

Journal

AIDS RESEARCH AND HUMAN RETROVIRUSES
Volume 29, Issue 9, Pages 1183-1189

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/aid.2013.0090

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ontario HIV Treatment Network
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oral daily tenofovir/emtricitabine (Truvada) is approved in the United States for HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) but has generated controversy in the media and within HIV-affected communities. We conducted an online survey about PrEP-related knowledge, experience, opinions, and learning needs, and received 160 responses from service providers at Canadian AIDS Service Organizations. Respondents were cautiously optimistic about PrEP and 48.8% believed that PrEP warranted Health Canada approval. In multivariable logistic regression, support for PrEP approval was associated with more years working in HIV (odds ratio = 1.89 per decade, 95% CI = 1.10, 3.25), low baseline familiarity with PrEP (OR = 3.24, 95% CI = 1.01, 14.41), and knowing someone who had used PrEP (OR = 4.39, 95% CI = 1.28,15.08). Participants major concerns about PrEP were similar to those highlighted in other publications, and some issues specific to certain target populations were raised. Several participants (26.2%) had been asked about PrEP in the past year and 10.6% knew of one or more Canadian who had used PrEP. Despite clients' interest, most participants thought that they (60.6%) or their organization (63.1%) did not have enough current knowledge about PrEP, highlighting the need for further education on this novel HIV prevention strategy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available