4.0 Article

Efficacy of antiretroviral drugs in reducing mother-to-child transmission of HIV in Africa: A meta-analysis of published clinical trials

Journal

AIDS RESEARCH AND HUMAN RETROVIRUSES
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages 827-837

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/aid.2007.0291

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) have been shown to be efficacious in decreasing mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of HIV. A summary estimate of the efficacy of ARVs in reducing MTCT is important for modeling and policy decisions. However, no one has hitherto attempted to generate this summary estimate for Africa, the continent with the greatest HIV/AIDS burden. This study estimates the efficacy of ARVs in reducing MTCT in Africa through a meta-analysis of published studies conducted in Africa. Using an a priori protocol, Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for primary studies that measured MTCT of HIV, had ARVs as the exposure to the mother, and were conducted in Africa. Extracted data included characteristics of the study, population, quality, exposure, and results. The data were analyzed using a random effects model with each trial arm as a data point. Ten randomized clinical trials conducted in West, East, and Southern Africa published from 1999 to 2007 satisfied the inclusion criteria. They ranged in sample size from 139 to 1797, and used different ARV regimens as the exposure to the mother antepartum, intrapartum, or postpartum, and to the baby. The combined effect estimate of using ARVs is 10.6% (95% CI: 8.6-13.1) transmission at 4-6 weeks and 21.0% (95% CI: 15.5-27.7) transmission for placebo. This represents approximately 50% efficacy. The result is stable and not driven by any single study. All regimens were well tolerated. We conclude that ARV use to reduce MTCT of HIV in Africa is efficacious and well tolerated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available