4.6 Article

Swimming as a Model of Task-Specific Locomotor Retraining After Spinal Cord Injury in the Rat

Journal

NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages 535-545

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1545968308331147

Keywords

Spinal cord injury; Swimming; Task-specific learning; Rat; Locomotor retraining; Rehabilitation

Funding

  1. The Kentucky Spinal Cord and Head Injury Research Trust
  2. NIH/NINDS [R01 NS052292]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. The authors have shown that rats can be retrained to swim after a moderately severe thoracic spinal cord contusion. They also found that improvements in body position and hindlimb activity occurred rapidly over the first 2 weeks of training, reaching a plateau by week 4. Overground walking was not influenced by swim training, suggesting that swimming may be a task-specific model of locomotor retraining. Objective. To provide a quantitative description of hindlimb movements of uninjured adult rats during swimming, and then after injury and retraining. Methods. The authors used a novel and streamlined kinematic assessment of swimming in which each limb is described in 2 dimensions, as 3 segments and 2 angles. Results. The kinematics of uninjured rats do not change over 4 weeks of daily swimming, suggesting that acclimatization does not involve refinements in hindlimb movement. After spinal cord injury, retraining involved increases in hindlimb excursion and improved limb position, but the velocity of the movements remained slow. Conclusion. These data suggest that the activity pattern of swimming is hardwired in the rat spinal cord. After spinal cord injury, repetition is sufficient to bring about significant improvements in the pattern of hindlimb movement but does not improve the forces generated, leaving the animals with persistent deficits. These data support the concept that force (load) and pattern generation (recruitment) are independent and may have to be managed together with respect to postinjury rehabilitation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available