4.4 Article

Safety and effectiveness of BufferGel and 0.5% PRO2000 gel for the prevention of HIV infection in women

Journal

AIDS
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages 957-966

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32834541d9

Keywords

BufferGel; HIV prevention; microbicide; PRO2000 gel; women

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health (NIH) [035]
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) [U01AI46749, U01AI068633, UO1AI068615]
  3. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
  4. National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA)
  5. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
  6. NICHD
  7. US Agency for International Development (USAID)
  8. ReProtect
  9. National Institutes for Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine the safety and effectiveness of BufferGel and 0.5% PRO2000 microbicide gels for the prevention of male-to-female HIV transmission. Design: Phase II/IIb, randomized, placebo-controlled trial with three double-blinded gel arms and an open-label no gel arm. Methods: Study participants from Malawi, South Africa, Zambia, Zimbabwe, and the USA were instructed to apply study gel up to 1 h before each sex act and safety, sexual behavior, pregnancy, gel adherence, acceptability, and HIV serostatus were assessed during follow-up. Results: The 3101 enrolled women were followed for an average of 20.4 months with 93.6% retention and 81.1% self-reported gel adherence. Adverse event rates were similar in all study arms. HIV incidence rates in the 0.5% PRO2000 gel, BufferGel, placebo gel, and no gel arms were 2.70, 4.14, 3.91, and 4.02 per 100 women-years, respectively. HIV incidence in the 0.5% PRO2000 gel arm was lower than the placebo gel arm (hazard ratio = 0.7, P = 0.10) and the no gel arm (hazard ratio = 0.67, P = 0.06). HIV incidence rates were similar in the BufferGel and both placebo gel (hazard ratio = 1.10, P = 0.63) and no gel control arms (hazard ratio = 1.05, P = 0.78). HIV incidence was similar in the placebo gel and no gel arms (hazard ratio = 0.97, P = 0.89). Conclusion: The 0.5% PRO2000 gel demonstrated a modest 30% reduction in HIV acquisition in women. However, these results were not statistically significant and subsequent findings from the Microbicide Development Programme (MDP) 301 trial have confirmed that 0.5% PRO2000 gel has little or no protective effect. BufferGel did not alter the risk of HIV infection. Both products were well tolerated. (C) 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available