4.4 Article

HIV integration site distributions in resting and activated CD4+ T cells infected in culture

Journal

AIDS
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages 1461-1471

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32832caf28

Keywords

CD4(+) T cells; gene expression; HIV integration; latency

Funding

  1. NIH [A152845, AI058862-06, AI058862-04S1]
  2. University of Pennsylvania Center for AIDS Research
  3. Penn Genorne Frontiers Institute with a grant with the Pennsylvania Department of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The goal of this study was to investigate whether the location of HIV integration differs in resting versus activated T cells, a feature that could contribute to the formation of latent viral reservoirs via effects on integration targeting. Design: Primary resting or activated CD4(+) T cells were infected with purified X4-tropic HIV in the presence and absence of nucleoside triphosphates and genomic locations of integrated provirus determined. Methods: We sequenced and analyzed a total of 2661 HIV integration sites using linker-mediated PCR and 454 sequencing. Integration site data sets were then compared to each other and to computationally generated random distributions. Results: HIV integration was favored in active transcription units in both cell types, but integration sites from activated cells were found more often in genomic regions that were dense in genes, dense in CpG islands, and enriched in G/C bases. Integration sites from activated cells were also more strongly correlated with histone methylation patterns associated with active genes. Conclusion: These data indicate that integration site distributions show modest but significant differences between resting and activated CD4(+) T cells, and that integration in resting cells occurs more often in regions that may be suboptimal for proviral gene expression. (C) 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available