4.4 Article

Prevention of mother-to-child transmission: program changes and the effect on uptake of the HIVNET012 regimen in Malawi

Journal

AIDS
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 83-87

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282f163b5

Keywords

Africa; prevention of perinatal transmission; vertical transmission; women

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [P30-AI50410, U19AI053217] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCCDPHP CDC HHS [SIP 26-04U48/DP00005] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective(s): To evaluate uptake of HIV testing in a prevention of mother-to-child transmission program (PMTCT) in Lilongwe, Malawi from April 2002 until December 2006. Design: Retrospective analysis of monthly reports from the beginning of the program. Setting: Four antenatal clinics in Lilongwe, Malawi. Methods: Pregnant women attending urban antenatal clinics in Lilongwe were invited to participate in a PMTCT program. Women were given information and education on antenatal care and PMTCT in groups of 8 to 12. Written informed consent for HIV testing was obtained privately. Women returned for the test result 1-2 weeks later. Mothers and infants were given the HIVNET012 regimen. Rapid HIV testing and 'opt-out' testing were instituted in July 2003 and April 2005, respectively. Infants were tested using HIV DNA PCR and, if HIV positive, a CD4 cell percentage was obtained and the infants were referred for further medical evaluation and treatment. Results: The program reached 20 000 pregnant women in the first 12 months. Acceptance of HIV testing increased from 45% to 73% (P<0.001) when rapid, same day testing was instituted. When opt-out testing was instituted, 99% of the mothers agreed to testing. Of the infants tested, 15.5% were HIV positive. Conclusion: Rapid HIV testing using the opt-out method increased acceptance of HIV testing in the PMTCT program to 99% in urban Lilongwe, Malawi. (c) 2008 Wolters Kluwer Health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available