4.6 Article

Formic acid decomposition on Au catalysts: DFT, microkinetic modeling, and reaction kinetics experiments

Journal

AICHE JOURNAL
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages 1303-1319

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aic.14401

Keywords

formic acid decomposition; density functional theory; catalysis; microkinetic modeling; active sites

Funding

  1. Institute of Atom-efficient Chemical Transformation (IACT), an Energy Frontier Research Center
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, and Office of Basic Energy Sciences
  3. Department of Energy's Office of Biological and Environmental Research located at PNNL
  4. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science [DEAC02-06CH11357, DE-AC02-05CH11231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A combined theoretical and experimental approach is presented that uses a comprehensive mean-field microkinetic model, reaction kinetics experiments, and scanning transmission electron microscopy imaging to unravel the reaction mechanism and provide insights into the nature of active sites for formic acid (HCOOH) decomposition on Au/SiC catalysts. All input parameters for the microkinetic model are derived from periodic, self-consistent, generalized gradient approximation (GGA-PW91) density functional theory calculations on the Au(111), Au(100), and Au(211) surfaces and are subsequently adjusted to describe the experimental HCOOH decomposition rate and selectivity data. It is shown that the HCOOH decomposition follows the formate (HCOO) mediated path, with 100% selectivity toward the dehydrogenation products (CO2 + H-2) under all reaction conditions. An analysis of the kinetic parameters suggests that an Au surface in which the coordination number of surface Au atoms is <= 4 may provide a better model for the active site of HCOOH decomposition on these specific supported Au catalysts. (c) 2014 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 60: 1303-1319, 2014

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available