4.3 Review

The multilingual matrix test: Principles, applications, and comparison across languages: A review

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY
Volume 54, Issue -, Pages 3-16

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1020971

Keywords

Speech intelligibility in noise; speech reception threshold; effect of language

Funding

  1. CEC
  2. European regional funds (EFRE-Project HurDig)
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [KO 942-13, EXC 1077 Hearing4all]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: A review of the development, evaluation, and application of the so-called matrix sentence test' for speech intelligibility testing in a multilingual society is provided. The format allows for repeated use with the same patient in her or his native language even if the experimenter does not understand the language. Design: Using a closed-set format, the syntactically fixed, semantically unpredictable sentences (e.g. Peter bought eight white ships') provide a vocabulary of 50 words (10 alternatives for each position in the sentence). The principles (i.e. construction, optimization, evaluation, and validation) for 14 different languages are reviewed. Studies of the influence of talker, language, noise, the training effect, open vs. closed conduct of the test, and the subjects' language proficiency are reported and application examples are discussed. Results: The optimization principles result in a steep intelligibility function and a high homogeneity of the speech materials presented and test lists employed, yielding a high efficiency and excellent comparability across languages. The characteristics of speakers generally dominate the differences across languages. Conclusion: The matrix test format with the principles outlined here is recommended for producing efficient, reliable, and comparable speech reception thresholds across different languages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available