4.7 Article

Cosmic queuing: galaxy satellites, building blocks and the hierarchical clustering paradigm

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 397, Issue 1, Pages L31-L35

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00678.x

Keywords

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation

Funding

  1. Fondecyt [1071006, 7080131]
  2. FONDAP Centro de Astrofisica
  3. Basal [PFG0609]
  4. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas, Argentina [PIP 5000/2005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study the properties of building blocks (BBs; i.e. accreted satellites) and surviving satellites of present-day galaxies using the semi-analytic model of galaxy formation SAG('semi-analytic galaxies') in the context of a concordance Lambda cold dark matter (Lambda CDM) cosmology. We consider large number of dark matter (DM) halo merger trees spanning a wide range of masses (similar to 1 x 10(10)-2.14 x 10(15) M-circle dot). We find higher metallicities for BBs with respect to surviving satellites, an effect produced by the same processes behind the build up of the mass-metallicity relation. We prove that these metallicity differences arise from the higher peak height in the density fluctuation field occupied by BBs and central galaxies which have collapsed into a single object earlier than surviving satellites. BBs start to form stars earlier, during the peak of the merger activity in Lambda CDM, and build up half of their final stellar mass (measured at the moment of disruption) up to four times faster than surviving satellites. Surviving satellites keep increasing their stellar masses rather quiescently down to z similar or equal to 1. The difference between the metallicities of satellites, BBs and central galaxies depends on the host DM halo mass, in a way that can be used as a further test for the concordance cosmology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available