4.3 Review

Evaluating hearing aid handling skills: A systematic and descriptive review

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY
Volume 54, Issue 11, Pages 765-776

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1052104

Keywords

Hearing aid; outcome; survey; systematic review

Funding

  1. Australian Postgraduate Award Scholarship through the School of Surgery, The University of Western Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To review and appraise the content and quality of surveys that evaluate hearing aid handling. Design: A systematic and descriptive review. Study sample: Twelve surveys were identified as containing at least one item evaluating hearing aid handling. Results: Fifteen aspects of hearing aid handling were evaluated. None of the surveys evaluated all aspects of handling skills identified. While the majority of studies reported some psychometric evaluation during survey development, the quality of the methodology used and extent of psychometric evaluation reported varied considerably. Conclusions: There is currently no single survey that evaluates handling skills comprehensively. In the absence of an ideal survey, the Practical Hearing aid Skills Test appears to be the most inclusive clinician-administered survey and the Hearing aid User's Questionnaire appears to be the most inclusive self-report survey evaluating hearing aid handling precision; however, there are limitations in the analysis of their psychometric properties. Nonetheless, use of these surveys in clinical practice could identify areas of handling that warrant additional training in order to improve hearing aid success. Research identifying the full range of hearing aid handling skills necessary for successful hearing aid use will further contribute knowledge to the complex construct of successful hearing aid-use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available