4.3 Article

Feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of motivational interviewing on hearing-aid use

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages 149-156

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1074733

Keywords

feasibility study; hearing-aid use; amplification; Motivational interviewing

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research [DRF-2011-04-001]
  2. Royal Surrey County Hospital
  3. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [DRF-2011-04-001] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)
  4. National Institute for Health Research [DRF-2011-04-001] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) on the effect of motivational interviewing (MI) on hearing-aid use. Design: This was a pilot single-blind, randomized parallel-group study conducted in the UK. Study sample: Thirty-seven adult patients who reported using their hearing aid(s) less than four hours per day were randomized to MI combined with Standard Care (MISC) (n = 20), and Standard Care only (SC) (n = 17). Results: Of 220 patients invited, 37 were enrolled giving the recruitment rate of 17%. One participant withdrew giving the retention rate of 97%. It was feasible to combine MI with SC for facilitating hearing-aid use and deliver the intervention with high fidelity in an audiology setting. The measure on hearing-aid use (data logging) one month after interventions favoured the MISC group. Conclusions: This pilot study suggests that conducting an RCT on using MI for facilitating hearing-aid use in people who do not use their hearing aids is feasible, and that MI combined with SC may have more positive effects on hearing-aid use compared to SC only.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available