4.5 Article

Effects of Zinc Fertilization on Zinc Dynamics in Potentially Zinc-Deficient Calcareous Soil

Journal

AGRONOMY JOURNAL
Volume 104, Issue 4, Pages 963-969

Publisher

AMER SOC AGRONOMY
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2011.0417

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Sciences Foundation of China [40971179, 31071863]
  2. Innovative Research Team Program of Northwest AF University
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for Northwest AF University [QN2011074]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In China, wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown on Zn-deficient calcareous soils oft en fails to meet the dietary needs of local populations. The effectiveness of Zn application to a potentially Zn-deficient calcareous soil was measured using two winter wheat cultivars and five Zn fertilizer rates (0, 7.5, 15, 30, 45 kg Zn ha(-1)). The results showed that Zn fertilizer increased grain Zn concentration in 2008-2009 by 11 to 33%; however, grain Zn concentrations were still insufficient for human dietary requirements. The apparent Zn utilization efficiency was between 0.14 and 0.98%. Within 1 wk of fertilizer Zn application, Zn weakly bound to organic matter (Wbo-Zn) increased by amounts equivalent to 63.4 to 84.0% of the fertilizer Zn application. Carbonate-bound Zn increased by amounts equivalent to 6.5 to 10.3% of the fertilizer Zn. The Wbo-Zn fraction decreased gradually with time, whereas mineral-bound Zn increased. Calculations indicated that 62.0 to 78.1% of the fertilizer Zn was mineral bound aft er 639 d. Diethyltriamine pentaacetic acid extractable Zn concentrations increased by 267 to 529% immediately aft er Zn fertilization but then decreased. In conclusion, available soil Zn concentrations increased quickly aft er Zn fertilizer application to a potentially Zn-deficient calcareous soil; however, the available Zn fractions were soon converted to mineral-bound forms that were unavailable for plant uptake.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available